Head to head · 2026 batting

Francisco Lindor vs Josh Naylor

So far in 2026 Francisco Lindor has been worth 1.8 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Francisco Lindor NYM

Josh Naylor SEA

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Francisco Lindor	Josh Naylor
G	97	145
PA	435	620
H	88	154
HR	20	10
RBI	48	54
SB	3	29
AVG	.227	.270
OBP	.313	.325
SLG	.432	.361
OPS	.744	.686
ISO	.204	.091
BB%	9.9%	6.8%
K%	20.2%	12.4%
wOBA	.329	.307
wRC+	108	96
WAR	2.4	0.6

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Francisco Lindor	Josh Naylor
G	1,632	888
PA	7,283	3,483
H	1,752	851
2B	350	168
3B	30	2
HR	299	114
RBI	904	489
BB	631	263
SO	1,208	534
SB	219	84
AVG	.271	.269
SLG	.473	.432
WAR	54.8	10.2

Francisco Lindor’s full profile →Josh Naylor’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Francisco Lindor vs

Josh Naylor vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.