Head to head · 2026 batting

Bryce Harper vs Juan Soto

In 2026 Bryce Harper has been worth 0.4 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Their 2026 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.
Two of the 25 most valuable batting careers on this site, 2005–2026, by dbWAR.

Bryce Harper PHI

Juan Soto NYM

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Bryce Harper	Juan Soto
G	161	111
PA	693	482
H	155	110
HR	29	27
RBI	87	68
SB	7	9
AVG	.269	.275
OBP	.380	.393
SLG	.485	.515
OPS	.865	.908
ISO	.217	.240
BB%	15.4%	16.2%
K%	21.4%	13.5%
wOBA	.378	.388
wRC+	136	150
WAR	4.3	3.9

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Bryce Harper	Juan Soto
G	60	43
PA	263	191
H	60	45
HR	18	11
RBI	36	30
BB	38	27
SO	61	40
SB	8	2
AVG	.271	.281
OBP	.382	.389
SLG	.593	.537
OPS	.974	.927

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Bryce Harper	Juan Soto
G	1,946	1,207
PA	8,358	5,285
H	1,956	1,196
2B	433	210
3B	27	18
HR	392	271
RBI	1,138	765
BB	1,212	974
SO	1,802	898
SB	159	104
AVG	.279	.281
SLG	.516	.530
WAR	63.4	51.6

Bryce Harper’s full profile →Juan Soto’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Bryce Harper vs

Juan Soto vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.