Head to head · 2026 batting

Alex Bregman vs Pete Crow-Armstrong

In 2026 Pete Crow-Armstrong has been worth 4.0 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Alex Bregman CHC

Pete Crow-Armstrong CHC

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Alex Bregman	Pete Crow-Armstrong
G	155	162
PA	702	726
H	161	175
HR	28	45
RBI	93	107
SB	3	41
AVG	.265	.280
OBP	.355	.372
SLG	.464	.570
OPS	.819	.943
ISO	.199	.291
BB%	10.8%	11.4%
K%	14.5%	25.8%
wOBA	.359	.402
wRC+	127	157
WAR	4.7	8.7

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Alex Bregman	Pete Crow-Armstrong
G	1,378	448
PA	6,029	1,802
H	1,411	409
2B	326	81
3B	20	18
HR	237	86
RBI	818	250
BB	703	136
SO	818	447
SB	46	105
AVG	.271	.255
SLG	.479	.489
WAR	45.0	13.6

Alex Bregman’s full profile →Pete Crow-Armstrong’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Alex Bregman vs

Pete Crow-Armstrong vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.