Head to head · 2025 batting

Paul DeJong vs Michael A. Taylor

In 2025 Paul DeJong has been worth 0.6 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Their 2025 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.

Paul DeJong WSH

Michael A. Taylor CWS

2025 season

2025 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Paul DeJong	Michael A. Taylor
G	55	112
PA	208	325
H	44	59
HR	6	9
RBI	23	35
SB	4	8
AVG	.228	.200
OBP	.269	.259
SLG	.373	.366
OPS	.642	.625
ISO	.145	.166
BB%	5.3%	7.1%
K%	33.7%	33.8%
wOBA	.279	.272
wRC+	75	70
WAR	0.2	-0.4

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Paul DeJong	Michael A. Taylor
G	14	19
PA	49	57
H	9	14
HR	0	4
RBI	3	10
BB	6	4
SO	17	18
SB	0	0
AVG	.214	.275
OBP	.327	.351
SLG	.262	.510
OPS	.588	.861

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Paul DeJong	Michael A. Taylor
G	909	1,125
PA	3,500	3,801
H	723	807
2B	147	156
3B	4	15
HR	146	109
RBI	423	388
BB	247	263
SO	975	1,164
SB	29	128
AVG	.229	.232
SLG	.416	.379
WAR	11.9	5.3

Paul DeJong’s full profile →Michael A. Taylor’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Paul DeJong vs

Michael A. Taylor vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.