Head to head · 2026 batting

William Contreras vs Gleyber Torres

In 2026 William Contreras has been worth 1.8 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Their 2025 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.

William Contreras MIL

Gleyber Torres DET

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	William Contreras	Gleyber Torres
G	147	96
PA	640	420
H	153	93
HR	18	8
RBI	94	38
SB	1	0
AVG	.270	.260
OBP	.341	.364
SLG	.417	.363
OPS	.758	.727
ISO	.147	.103
BB%	9.5%	13.6%
K%	14.7%	19.3%
wOBA	.332	.331
wRC+	109	111
WAR	3.6	1.8

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	William Contreras	Gleyber Torres
G	31	53
PA	127	236
H	33	54
HR	5	8
RBI	14	26
BB	12	28
SO	24	42
SB	1	6
AVG	.287	.262
OBP	.354	.352
SLG	.452	.427
OPS	.807	.779

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	William Contreras	Gleyber Torres
G	744	1,128
PA	3,160	4,721
H	755	1,099
2B	149	189
3B	6	4
HR	103	162
RBI	409	553
BB	344	475
SO	641	928
SB	24	57
AVG	.272	.263
SLG	.442	.427
WAR	21.6	24.7

William Contreras’s full profile →Gleyber Torres’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

William Contreras vs

Gleyber Torres vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.