Head to head · 2026 ALDS batting
Trent Grisham vs Richie Palacios
In 2026 Richie Palacios has been worth 0.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Trent Grisham | Richie Palacios |
|---|---|---|
| G | 3 | 3 |
| PA | 11 | 10 |
| H | 0 | 2 |
| HR | 0 | 0 |
| RBI | 0 | 2 |
| BB | 0 | 0 |
| SO | 5 | 3 |
| SB | 0 | 0 |
| AVG | .000 | .200 |
| OBP | .000 | .200 |
| SLG | .000 | .300 |
| OPS | .000 | .500 |
| Statistic | Trent Grisham | Richie Palacios |
|---|---|---|
| G | 31 | 10 |
| PA | 125 | 32 |
| H | 17 | 8 |
| HR | 3 | 0 |
| RBI | 7 | 4 |
| BB | 13 | 0 |
| SO | 43 | 8 |
| SB | 2 | 1 |
| AVG | .156 | .258 |
| OBP | .264 | .258 |
| SLG | .266 | .355 |
| OPS | .530 | .613 |
2026 season
| Statistic | Trent Grisham | Richie Palacios |
|---|---|---|
| G | 120 | 122 |
| PA | 484 | 399 |
| H | 88 | 81 |
| HR | 18 | 10 |
| RBI | 59 | 57 |
| SB | 9 | 17 |
| AVG | .211 | .235 |
| OBP | .308 | .330 |
| SLG | .395 | .374 |
| OPS | .703 | .704 |
| ISO | .184 | .139 |
| BB% | 12.6% | 11.5% |
| K% | 18.4% | 17.0% |
| wOBA | .314 | .319 |
| wRC+ | 93 | 100 |
| WAR | 1.6 | 1.7 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Trent Grisham | Richie Palacios |
|---|---|---|
| G | 861 | 313 |
| PA | 3,315 | 988 |
| H | 616 | 204 |
| 2B | 125 | 36 |
| 3B | 14 | 3 |
| HR | 122 | 22 |
| RBI | 379 | 107 |
| BB | 402 | 111 |
| SO | 818 | 175 |
| SB | 59 | 44 |
| AVG | .217 | .238 |
| SLG | .399 | .364 |
| WAR | 13.9 | 3.6 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.

