Head to head · 2026 batting

Nathaniel Lowe vs LaMonte Wade Jr.

So far in 2026 Nathaniel Lowe has been worth 1.4 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Nathaniel Lowe CIN

LaMonte Wade Jr.HOU

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Nathaniel Lowe	LaMonte Wade Jr.
G	117	51
PA	412	143
H	94	26
HR	17	4
RBI	59	19
SB	0	0
AVG	.255	.208
OBP	.323	.308
SLG	.454	.352
OPS	.777	.660
ISO	.198	.144
BB%	9.0%	12.6%
K%	23.8%	24.5%
wOBA	.338	.300
wRC+	117	89
WAR	1.4	0.0

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Nathaniel Lowe	LaMonte Wade Jr.
G	954	597
PA	3,842	2,050
H	890	407
2B	159	73
3B	13	9
HR	124	59
RBI	472	204
BB	413	257
SO	934	436
SB	15	13
AVG	.263	.234
SLG	.427	.387
WAR	14.2	5.6

Nathaniel Lowe’s full profile →LaMonte Wade Jr.’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Nathaniel Lowe vs

LaMonte Wade Jr. vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.