Head to head · 2026 NLDS batting

Ty France vs Garrett Mitchell

In 2026 Garrett Mitchell has been worth 0.2 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Opponents in the 2026 NLDS, where the Milwaukee Brewers won 3-1 over the San Diego Padres.

Ty France SD

Garrett Mitchell MIL

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

2026 NLDS.
Statistic	Ty France	Garrett Mitchell
G	4	4
PA	17	16
H	3	4
HR	0	0
RBI	2	1
BB	1	1
SO	3	6
SB	0	1
AVG	.214	.267
OBP	.353	.313
SLG	.214	.400
OPS	.567	.713

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Ty France	Garrett Mitchell
G	13	15
PA	56	59
H	14	10
HR	0	3
RBI	5	7
BB	2	7
SO	11	21
SB	0	1
AVG	.269	.192
OBP	.321	.288
SLG	.308	.404
OPS	.629	.692

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Ty France	Garrett Mitchell
G	128	144
PA	500	531
H	130	121
HR	21	11
RBI	72	65
SB	1	14
AVG	.295	.262
OBP	.363	.354
SLG	.502	.416
OPS	.865	.771
ISO	.207	.154
BB%	7.4%	11.3%
K%	21.6%	31.5%
wOBA	.375	.343
wRC+	145	117
WAR	3.1	3.3

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Ty France	Garrett Mitchell
G	965	277
PA	3,809	974
H	906	220
2B	181	51
3B	6	9
HR	102	24
RBI	436	105
BB	241	105
SO	708	317
SB	4	37
AVG	.267	.259
SLG	.414	.424
WAR	10.8	6.3

Ty France’s full profile →Garrett Mitchell’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Ty France vs

Garrett Mitchell vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.