Head to head · 2026 NLCS batting

Garrett Mitchell vs Shohei Ohtani

In 2026 Shohei Ohtani has been worth 0.5 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Opponents in the 2026 NLCS, where the Milwaukee Brewers won 4-0 over the Los Angeles Dodgers.

Garrett Mitchell MIL

Shohei Ohtani LAD

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

2026 NLCS.
Statistic	Garrett Mitchell	Shohei Ohtani
G	4	4
PA	17	16
H	2	3
HR	2	1
RBI	2	3
BB	3	2
SO	6	6
SB	0	0
AVG	.143	.231
OBP	.294	.375
SLG	.571	.462
OPS	.866	.837

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Garrett Mitchell	Shohei Ohtani
G	15	41
PA	59	192
H	10	37
HR	3	12
RBI	7	27
BB	7	33
SO	21	55
SB	1	2
AVG	.192	.239
OBP	.288	.379
SLG	.404	.510
OPS	.692	.889

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Garrett Mitchell	Shohei Ohtani
G	144	135
PA	531	618
H	121	144
HR	11	30
RBI	65	81
SB	14	11
AVG	.262	.275
OBP	.354	.377
SLG	.416	.512
OPS	.771	.889
ISO	.154	.237
BB%	11.3%	13.1%
K%	31.5%	24.6%
wOBA	.343	.379
wRC+	117	143
WAR	3.3	3.8

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Garrett Mitchell	Shohei Ohtani
G	277	1,153
PA	974	4,947
H	220	1,194
2B	51	218
3B	9	49
HR	24	310
RBI	105	750
BB	105	622
SO	317	1,256
SB	37	176
AVG	.259	.281
SLG	.424	.574
WAR	6.3	41.9

Garrett Mitchell’s full profile →Shohei Ohtani’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Garrett Mitchell vs

Shohei Ohtani vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.