Head to head · 2026 NLCS batting
Garrett Mitchell vs Andy Pages
In 2026 Andy Pages has been worth 0.6 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Garrett Mitchell | Andy Pages |
|---|---|---|
| G | 4 | 4 |
| PA | 17 | 13 |
| H | 2 | 3 |
| HR | 2 | 0 |
| RBI | 2 | 2 |
| BB | 3 | 1 |
| SO | 6 | 4 |
| SB | 0 | 0 |
| AVG | .143 | .250 |
| OBP | .294 | .308 |
| SLG | .571 | .333 |
| OPS | .866 | .641 |
| Statistic | Garrett Mitchell | Andy Pages |
|---|---|---|
| G | 15 | 28 |
| PA | 59 | 103 |
| H | 10 | 15 |
| HR | 3 | 2 |
| RBI | 7 | 9 |
| BB | 7 | 2 |
| SO | 21 | 26 |
| SB | 1 | 0 |
| AVG | .192 | .156 |
| OBP | .288 | .198 |
| SLG | .404 | .240 |
| OPS | .692 | .438 |
2026 season
| Statistic | Garrett Mitchell | Andy Pages |
|---|---|---|
| G | 144 | 133 |
| PA | 531 | 574 |
| H | 121 | 140 |
| HR | 11 | 23 |
| RBI | 65 | 85 |
| SB | 14 | 13 |
| AVG | .262 | .274 |
| OBP | .354 | .343 |
| SLG | .416 | .468 |
| OPS | .771 | .811 |
| ISO | .154 | .194 |
| BB% | 11.3% | 8.5% |
| K% | 31.5% | 19.7% |
| wOBA | .343 | .354 |
| wRC+ | 117 | 125 |
| WAR | 3.3 | 3.9 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Garrett Mitchell | Andy Pages |
|---|---|---|
| G | 277 | 403 |
| PA | 974 | 1,641 |
| H | 220 | 398 |
| 2B | 51 | 76 |
| 3B | 9 | 4 |
| HR | 24 | 63 |
| RBI | 105 | 217 |
| BB | 105 | 107 |
| SO | 317 | 356 |
| SB | 37 | 28 |
| AVG | .259 | .266 |
| SLG | .424 | .449 |
| WAR | 6.3 | 8.0 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.

