Head to head · 2026 batting

Jackson Chourio vs Pete Crow-Armstrong

So far in 2026 Pete Crow-Armstrong has been worth 4.8 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Jackson Chourio MIL

Pete Crow-Armstrong CHC

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Jackson Chourio	Pete Crow-Armstrong
G	120	155
PA	549	697
H	143	167
HR	24	44
RBI	70	105
SB	19	37
AVG	.285	.277
OBP	.342	.369
SLG	.482	.571
OPS	.825	.941
ISO	.197	.294
BB%	7.8%	11.2%
K%	23.5%	26.1%
wOBA	.356	.401
wRC+	126	156
WAR	3.4	8.2

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Jackson Chourio	Pete Crow-Armstrong
G	396	441
PA	1,711	1,773
H	436	401
2B	91	79
3B	8	18
HR	66	85
RBI	227	248
BB	112	131
SO	371	442
SB	62	101
AVG	.276	.254
SLG	.469	.488
WAR	9.2	13.1

Jackson Chourio’s full profile →Pete Crow-Armstrong’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Jackson Chourio vs

Pete Crow-Armstrong vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.