Head to head · 2026 batting

Joc Pederson vs Kyle Tucker

So far in 2026 Kyle Tucker has been worth 0.6 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Joc Pederson TEX

Kyle Tucker LAD

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Joc Pederson	Kyle Tucker
G	136	146
PA	432	601
H	88	121
HR	26	17
RBI	53	70
SB	2	11
AVG	.235	.235
OBP	.329	.334
SLG	.487	.394
OPS	.816	.729
ISO	.251	.159
BB%	11.3%	12.8%
K%	23.6%	17.0%
wOBA	.353	.327
wRC+	127	106
WAR	1.7	2.3

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Joc Pederson	Kyle Tucker
G	1,468	911
PA	5,005	3,759
H	1,019	869
2B	203	183
3B	20	24
HR	244	164
RBI	628	560
BB	571	440
SO	1,176	600
SB	33	130
AVG	.237	.267
SLG	.464	.489
WAR	22.8	25.1

Joc Pederson’s full profile →Kyle Tucker’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Joc Pederson vs

Kyle Tucker vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.