Head to head · 2026 batting

Mitch Garver vs Trent Grisham

So far in 2026 Trent Grisham has been worth 1.4 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Mitch Garver SEA

Trent Grisham NYY

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Mitch Garver	Trent Grisham
G	47	120
PA	149	484
H	22	88
HR	4	18
RBI	15	59
SB	1	9
AVG	.175	.211
OBP	.302	.308
SLG	.294	.395
OPS	.596	.703
ISO	.119	.184
BB%	14.8%	12.6%
K%	32.9%	18.4%
wOBA	.282	.314
wRC+	77	93
WAR	0.2	1.6

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Mitch Garver	Trent Grisham
G	683	861
PA	2,498	3,315
H	497	616
2B	95	125
3B	7	14
HR	110	122
RBI	324	379
BB	286	402
SO	679	818
SB	6	59
AVG	.229	.217
SLG	.432	.399
WAR	10.2	13.9

Mitch Garver’s full profile →Trent Grisham’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Mitch Garver vs

Trent Grisham vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.