Head to head · 2026 batting

Trent Grisham vs Francisco Lindor

So far in 2026 Francisco Lindor has been worth 0.8 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Trent Grisham NYY

Francisco Lindor NYM

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Trent Grisham	Francisco Lindor
G	120	97
PA	484	435
H	88	88
HR	18	20
RBI	59	48
SB	9	3
AVG	.211	.227
OBP	.308	.313
SLG	.395	.432
OPS	.703	.744
ISO	.184	.204
BB%	12.6%	9.9%
K%	18.4%	20.2%
wOBA	.314	.329
wRC+	93	108
WAR	1.6	2.4

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Trent Grisham	Francisco Lindor
G	861	1,632
PA	3,315	7,283
H	616	1,752
2B	125	350
3B	14	30
HR	122	299
RBI	379	904
BB	402	631
SO	818	1,208
SB	59	219
AVG	.217	.271
SLG	.399	.473
WAR	13.9	54.8

Trent Grisham’s full profile →Francisco Lindor’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Trent Grisham vs

Francisco Lindor vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.