Head to head · 2026 batting

Pete Alonso vs Matt Chapman

So far in 2026 Pete Alonso has been worth 3.2 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Pete Alonso BAL

Matt Chapman SF

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Pete Alonso	Matt Chapman
G	155	84
PA	674	352
H	154	72
HR	38	7
RBI	105	42
SB	5	0
AVG	.266	.235
OBP	.361	.324
SLG	.503	.368
OPS	.864	.692
ISO	.238	.134
BB%	11.6%	10.5%
K%	24.2%	23.0%
wOBA	.374	.311
wRC+	142	96
WAR	4.3	1.1

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Pete Alonso	Matt Chapman
G	1,162	1,226
PA	4,990	5,122
H	1,105	1,073
2B	207	271
3B	8	24
HR	302	210
RBI	817	607
BB	497	553
SO	1,147	1,341
SB	23	35
AVG	.254	.240
SLG	.514	.452
WAR	27.8	28.3

Pete Alonso’s full profile →Matt Chapman’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Pete Alonso vs

Matt Chapman vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.