Head to head · 2025 batting

Pete Crow-Armstrong vs Kevin Pillar

In 2025 Pete Crow-Armstrong has been worth 3.9 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Pete Crow-Armstrong CHC

Kevin Pillar TEX

2025 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Pete Crow-Armstrong	Kevin Pillar
G	156	19
PA	647	43
H	146	9
HR	31	0
RBI	95	1
SB	35	3
AVG	.247	.209
OBP	.287	.209
SLG	.481	.256
OPS	.768	.465
ISO	.234	.047
BB%	4.5%	0.0%
K%	24.0%	18.6%
wOBA	.324	.203
wRC+	106	22
WAR	3.7	-0.2

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Pete Crow-Armstrong	Kevin Pillar
G	441	1,121
PA	1,773	4,177
H	401	1,001
2B	79	232
3B	18	16
HR	85	109
RBI	248	449
BB	131	168
SO	442	710
SB	101	110
AVG	.254	.256
SLG	.488	.407
WAR	13.1	8.8

Pete Crow-Armstrong’s full profile →Kevin Pillar’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Pete Crow-Armstrong vs

Kevin Pillar vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.