Head to head · 2026 batting

Pete Crow-Armstrong vs Jorge Mateo

So far in 2026 Pete Crow-Armstrong has been worth 8.2 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Pete Crow-Armstrong CHC

Jorge Mateo ATL

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Pete Crow-Armstrong	Jorge Mateo
G	155	83
PA	697	207
H	167	40
HR	44	5
RBI	105	18
SB	37	19
AVG	.277	.207
OBP	.369	.252
SLG	.571	.321
OPS	.941	.574
ISO	.294	.114
BB%	11.2%	5.3%
K%	26.1%	30.9%
wOBA	.401	.256
wRC+	156	55
WAR	8.2	0.0

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Pete Crow-Armstrong	Jorge Mateo
G	441	537
PA	1,773	1,618
H	401	328
2B	79	78
3B	18	12
HR	85	35
RBI	248	139
BB	131	84
SO	442	437
SB	101	125
AVG	.254	.219
SLG	.488	.358
WAR	13.1	2.8

Pete Crow-Armstrong’s full profile →Jorge Mateo’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Pete Crow-Armstrong vs

Jorge Mateo vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.