Head to head · 2026 batting

Pete Crow-Armstrong vs Lane Thomas

So far in 2026 Pete Crow-Armstrong has been worth 7.2 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Pete Crow-Armstrong CHC

Lane Thomas KC

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Pete Crow-Armstrong	Lane Thomas
G	155	116
PA	697	374
H	167	73
HR	44	11
RBI	105	40
SB	37	9
AVG	.277	.224
OBP	.369	.318
SLG	.571	.383
OPS	.941	.702
ISO	.294	.160
BB%	11.2%	11.8%
K%	26.1%	24.9%
wOBA	.401	.315
wRC+	156	94
WAR	8.2	1.0

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Pete Crow-Armstrong	Lane Thomas
G	441	692
PA	1,773	2,622
H	401	562
2B	79	126
3B	18	11
HR	85	87
RBI	248	294
BB	131	224
SO	442	666
SB	101	80
AVG	.254	.239
SLG	.488	.413
WAR	13.1	7.6

Pete Crow-Armstrong’s full profile →Lane Thomas’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Pete Crow-Armstrong vs

Lane Thomas vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.