Head to head · 2026 batting

José Caballero vs Pete Crow-Armstrong

So far in 2026 Pete Crow-Armstrong has been worth 7.2 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

José Caballero NYY

Pete Crow-Armstrong CHC

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	José Caballero	Pete Crow-Armstrong
G	126	155
PA	438	697
H	94	167
HR	14	44
RBI	51	105
SB	32	37
AVG	.238	.277
OBP	.295	.369
SLG	.375	.571
OPS	.670	.941
ISO	.137	.294
BB%	6.2%	11.2%
K%	23.7%	26.1%
wOBA	.297	.401
wRC+	82	156
WAR	1.0	8.2

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	José Caballero	Pete Crow-Armstrong
G	474	441
PA	1,571	1,773
H	319	401
2B	63	79
3B	3	18
HR	32	85
RBI	157	248
BB	129	131
SO	401	442
SB	151	101
AVG	.231	.254
SLG	.350	.488
WAR	5.4	13.1

José Caballero’s full profile →Pete Crow-Armstrong’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

José Caballero vs

Pete Crow-Armstrong vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.