Head to head · 2026 batting

Harrison Bader vs Pete Crow-Armstrong

So far in 2026 Pete Crow-Armstrong has been worth 8.6 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Harrison Bader SF

Pete Crow-Armstrong CHC

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Harrison Bader	Pete Crow-Armstrong
G	30	155
PA	111	697
H	18	167
HR	5	44
RBI	14	105
SB	0	37
AVG	.170	.277
OBP	.198	.369
SLG	.358	.571
OPS	.557	.941
ISO	.189	.294
BB%	3.6%	11.2%
K%	30.6%	26.1%
wOBA	.238	.401
wRC+	45	156
WAR	-0.4	8.2

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Harrison Bader	Pete Crow-Armstrong
G	913	441
PA	3,157	1,773
H	697	401
2B	135	79
3B	14	18
HR	93	85
RBI	336	248
BB	218	131
SO	777	442
SB	105	101
AVG	.244	.254
SLG	.400	.488
WAR	10.2	13.1

Harrison Bader’s full profile →Pete Crow-Armstrong’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Harrison Bader vs

Pete Crow-Armstrong vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.