Head to head · 2026 batting

Pete Crow-Armstrong vs David Hamilton

So far in 2026 Pete Crow-Armstrong has been worth 7.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Pete Crow-Armstrong CHC

David Hamilton MIL

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Pete Crow-Armstrong	David Hamilton
G	155	110
PA	697	370
H	167	78
HR	44	4
RBI	105	26
SB	37	28
AVG	.277	.240
OBP	.369	.308
SLG	.571	.329
OPS	.941	.637
ISO	.294	.089
BB%	11.2%	8.4%
K%	26.1%	22.4%
wOBA	.401	.290
wRC+	156	80
WAR	8.2	1.1

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Pete Crow-Armstrong	David Hamilton
G	441	292
PA	1,773	920
H	401	190
2B	79	34
3B	18	5
HR	85	18
RBI	248	73
BB	131	72
SO	442	220
SB	101	85
AVG	.254	.229
SLG	.488	.347
WAR	13.1	2.9

Pete Crow-Armstrong’s full profile →David Hamilton’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Pete Crow-Armstrong vs

David Hamilton vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.