Head to head · 2026 batting

Pete Crow-Armstrong vs Stuart Fairchild

So far in 2026 Pete Crow-Armstrong has been worth 8.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Pete Crow-Armstrong CHC

Stuart Fairchild CLE

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Pete Crow-Armstrong	Stuart Fairchild
G	155	13
PA	697	27
H	167	3
HR	44	0
RBI	105	1
SB	37	2
AVG	.277	.158
OBP	.369	.407
SLG	.571	.158
OPS	.941	.565
ISO	.294	.000
BB%	11.2%	25.9%
K%	26.1%	51.9%
wOBA	.401	.315
wRC+	156	96
WAR	8.2	0.1

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Pete Crow-Armstrong	Stuart Fairchild
G	441	265
PA	1,773	697
H	401	135
2B	79	33
3B	18	4
HR	85	18
RBI	248	69
BB	131	62
SO	442	195
SB	101	27
AVG	.254	.221
SLG	.488	.377
WAR	13.1	1.7

Pete Crow-Armstrong’s full profile →Stuart Fairchild’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Pete Crow-Armstrong vs

Stuart Fairchild vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.